Debt Justice

Multilateral, bi-lateral and private lenders dominate in setting the rules and definitions surrounding debt issues, resulting in a system that drives many impoverished countries into long-term indebtedness, and which is ill-equipped to tackle debt crises in a timely, just and durable manner. As the nature of developing country debt becomes more complex, and traditional creditors are joined by new, and increasingly commercial lenders, risks to debt sustainability are growing. Market-based approaches to development further exacerbate these risks.

 

There is a urgent need to promote fundamental reforms to how debt crises are prevented and resolved, challenge irresponsible financing and the legitimacy of debts, and put the needs and rights of people ahead of debt service.

 

Sri Lanka should work closely with civil society partners in the global north and the global south to strengthen a more powerful global debt movement to push forward this transformative agenda.

ABC of the Debt Crisis - FAQ

Understanding Sri Lanka's debt crisis

Sri Lanka’s bondholders to get repaid 20%-46% more than China

 27 July 24 (Debt Justice UK)

Sri Lanka’s Debt Restructuring: A Win for Private Bondholders

20 July 24 (Dr Chandru Chandrasekhar)

CSO's and TU's reject cosmetic consultations of IMF

19 Mar 24 (admin) 


182 Academics calling for Sri Lanka Debt Cancellation

 8 Jan 23 (Debt Justice UK)

Evolution of Chinese Lending to Sri Lanka - Separating Myth from Reality

28 Nov 22 (Umesh Moramudali)

IMF Agreement Will Not Alter the Trajectory of a Collapsing Economy

22 Mar 23 (Ahilan Kadiragama, Devaka Gunawardena, Sinthuja Sritharan) 

 

An open letter to IMF office and IMF Mission in/to Sri Lanka

9 April 23 (Charith Gunawardena, Kanchana Ruwanpura, Kanishka Goonawardena

 

The Real Cause of Sri Lanka’s Debt Trap

2 Mar 23 (Shiran Illaperuma, Bram Nicholas)

Hedge funds holding up vital debt relief for crisis-hit Sri Lanka, warn economists

Elliott, Larry. 2023. The Guardian.

Unveiling the Controversies Surrounding Debt-for-Nature Swaps

1 June 23 (Institute for Political Economy)

Navigating Beyond IMF Conditions for Sustainable Economic Growth

1 Jun 23 (Institute for Political Economy)

Impact of US Fiscal stimulus programs on Global South

2 Jun 23 (Institute for Political Economy)

Odious debts owed to external private creditors must be cancelled.

The harmful global debt architecture must change. 

Prof Yanis Varoufakis

Sri Lanka Economic Crisis & the IMF, 23 Nov 2022, (State of the Nation)

Prof Jayati Ghosh

Lessons from Sri Lankan Debt Crisis, 23 Feb 23 (Research Intelligence Unit)

Money Unchartered

Why are the IMF and World Bank so controversial? 8 Oct 2022

Heidi Chow, Debt Justice UK

Lessons from Sri Lankan Debt Crisis, 23 Feb 23 (Research Intelligence Unit)

Dr Howard Nicholas

Debt forgiveness would be the only solution . Jan 13, 2023 (Ada Derana)

Dr Ahilan Kadiragama

Colombo consultation on debt restructuring, 28 Mar 23 (Law & Society Trust)

Sovereign Debt

Multilateral creditors

Claims granted by international financial institutions (mainly the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank or regional development banks such as the Asian Development Bank) constitute multilateral debt.

Bilateral creditors

Claims granted by official bilateral creditors i.e. States (governments or their appropriate institutions, especially export credit agencies) constitute bilateral debt. Paris Club (US, EU, Japan), India & China are major creditors.

Private creditors

All creditors other than multilateral or official bilateral creditors are considered private creditors. These include suppliers, commercial banks and bondholders (International Sovereign Bonds issued by Sri Lanka in Dollars.)

Domestic Debt Optimisation is not the priority

“The DDO is no solution to the debt crisis.  It is merely a way of reducing losses for foreign creditors who have already earned large profits on the debt they channelled to the Sri Lankan government without due diligence.  The entirety of that debt, which markets have been treating as near worthless, needs to be written off” – Prof C P Chandrasekhar

Irresponsible, Irrational and Inequitable

IRRESPONSIBLE: Giving equivalence to rupee denominated domestic debt and dollar denominated external debt.
IRRATIONAL: Returning to global financial markets in 2027 for further borrowing needs without seeking sustainable alternatives.
INEQUITABLE: Burdening the poorest workers by targeting their superannuation funds (particularly the EPF) for interest rate cuts.
- Charith Gunawardena

Overview of Debt Crisis.

Sri Lanka’s balance of payments deficit, burdened by unsustainable levels of dollar borrowings, is the key driver of the debt crisis.  

 

There is no equivalence between domestic debt, the rupee borrowings (obligations can always be fulfilled by the government) and external debt, the US dollar borrowings.   The external debt needs to be restructured, including the cancellation (or large haircut) of private creditor debts.

Government

The government revenue (in rupees and dollars) is inadequate to fulfil its obligations.

Revenue

The funding mechanisms available to the government for its rupee and dollar expenditure are unbalanced.

Expenditure

The government expenditure is not prioritised to enhance the well-being of people and environment in Sri Lanka.